Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
by alkonaut on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @01:00PM
(#18708797)
Filming the way these cameras show which include part of the street would probably be considered not-ok in many jurisdictions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
by darkarmani on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @03:36PM
(#18710297)
Not inside the US. There is no expectation of privacy when you are in public.
Not here either - I can take a photo of anyone in the street. However, I can’t mount a fixed surveillance camera on my house and do the same (for some reason).
Please provide a citation on this.
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
by alkonaut on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @01:57AM
(#18713684)
This is Swedish law (or at least clear authority guidelines). I can’t find an English link but if you absolutely don’t believe me I could translate (but just want to make sure you didn’t think I was talking about US law before I waste that effort :D )
Re:Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
by alkonaut on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @04:27AM
(#18714394)
relevant passage >
"Camera surveillance of a location where the public has access. Permission 8 § Camera surveillance is required for a surveillance camera to be posted so that it can be directed to a place where the public has access."
Swedish: http://rkrattsbaser.gov.se/sfst?bet=2013:460 (poor) translation: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&tl=en&u=h...
(In separate guidelines it explicitly mentions the case of home cameras covering public area).