Re:Facebook says new bug allowed apps access to private phot...
by eropple on Friday December 14, 2018 @06:31PM
(#18685880)
Are these lawyers you have talked to and gotten meaningful and nuanced advice from, or are they lawyers your bosses have talked to and derived maximally avoidant policies from? I'm not saying that you shouldn't have policies that fit your risk profile, but I ask because I have been in those former conversations (and I have done a nontrivial amount of auditing+compliance work in this space) and have never come away with such an impression, while at the same time the level of perceived risk that your bosses derive from those conversations can be entirely untethered from the level of risk that actually exists. (This space is full of people saying "oh, HIPAA means we can't do that" as shorthand for "I don't want to do that," after all.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Facebook says new bug allowed apps access to private phot...
by reaperducer on Friday December 14, 2018 @09:17PM
(#18686620)
They are lawyers who personally do our training and put together testing material based on that training.
To me that trumps a non-lawyer’s interpretation of a non-legal web site.
Re:Facebook says new bug allowed apps access to private phot...
by eropple on Saturday December 15, 2018 @06:24PM
(#18690920)
If you read the sibling comment where Spooky23 cites the HHS page on HIPAA, it might be worth ruminating on that versus your interpretation of why your company's lawyers lay out the training in the way that they do.
That they have a different company risk profile doesn't necessarily change the facts at hand. And, TBH, they don't have to tell you the truth if it helps achieve their immediate goals. (They can tell you you'd be personally and criminally liable. It might make you do what they want better. It might also not be true.) Or it may all be in good faith. But what you describe doesn't square with anything I've ever worked with, at multiple clients and employers.