For bonus points, even if the cost were exactly the same per unit of power, do a cost analysis of which costs more to implement under the different project timelines, using different financing scenarios?
We should also spend a lot of money working on storage solutions, but with the planet at stake it doesn't seem smart to put all our eggs in that basket.
https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/lightsource-sol...
https://www.energy-storage.news/news/jp-morgan-buys-into-10....
Costs are going down, but MSRs look a lot cheaper than conventional nuclear too, so if we're going to look to the future let's do it with both.
No, there isn't. A problem isn't solved until a solution has been fully implemented.
There is a difference between that and the time it takes to identify a solution in principle.
How long till we solve renewable production/storage problems? How long to refine those solutions to the point where it takes 7.5 years to deploy the solar equivalent of the Bruce Nuclear Generating Station?
The time between then and now is the amount of years the world will be burning coal.