News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on License Changes for Confluent Platform. Parent comment

Re:License Changes for Confluent Platform by mindcrime on Friday December 14, 2018 @11:43AM (#18682144)
a primary maintainer of the open source project (not sure how that works for Confluent and Kafka).

In theory Apache projects are supposed to exist in such a way that one vendor doesn't dominate all the decision making and development. In reality, it's not uncommon for a given vendor to have outsized influence on a given project. See: Ambari and Hortonworks, for example.

I don't follow Kafka development super closely, but I believe Confluent do have significant influence, but I'm not sure if it's to an extent that could be considered dangerous or not.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:License Changes for Confluent Platform by PeterCorless on Friday December 14, 2018 @11:18PM (#18687009)
It is also far more dependent on personality of project leadership and contributors than pure % of code committed. Jay is well-regarded as a 'good guy' and has the interest of the technology at heart. Such personalities in leadership can change a project greatly though. A bad project leader may lose a great deal of public goodwill in an open source project. That is a key intangible that many do not take into account -- trustworthiness of leadership.
[ Parent | on HN ]