News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++ (2012). Parent comment

Re:Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++ (2012) by Gibbon1 on Thursday December 13, 2018 @07:36PM (#18677441)
> a seasoned C dev. To list a few: return codes, errno and longjump

A seasoned dev that thinks errno and longjump are good idea's should have retired 25 years ago.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++ (2012) by dkrikun on Saturday December 15, 2018 @12:29PM (#18689295)
Yeah, I just tried to be on the more "permissive" side of things. Though per-library errno is being used (zeromq, libuv).
[ Parent | on HN ]