News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++ (2012) by speedplane on Wednesday December 12, 2018 @11:50PM (#18669905)
> There are only languages where exceptions need to be hand-rolled in an ad-hoc fashion. This ad-hoc approach does not work.

C has no exceptions. It seems to be quite successful.

Re:Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++ (2012) by jcelerier on Thursday December 13, 2018 @03:03AM (#18670625)
Well no, every time you have a chain of functions in your call stack that all do

    if(f(blah) != E_OK) {
      return E_WHATEVER;
    }
(which is veeeery common in C) you are reimplementing exceptions by hand (and with less performance in the no-error case since you still pay for the branches, while a C++ code with exceptions would just be a sequence of function calls without branches in that case)
Re:Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++ (2012) by speedplane on Friday December 14, 2018 @02:34AM (#18679147)
I wouldn't disagree with you. The OP said that programming languages w/o exceptions aren't successful. C doesn't use exceptions, it has it's own way of dealing with similar issues, and yet it's quite successful.