Re:Harvard Quietly Amasses California Vineyards and the Wate...
by triviatise on Wednesday December 12, 2018 @01:27AM
(#18661778)
at my school EE had a full semiconductor fab, nuclear engineering had a nuclear reactor, CS had a full networked computer system with 512x512 UI that predated the internet, super computers, astronomy had an observatory etc.
Currently I think they have an offsite particle accelerator in physics, but Im sure they had sensitive measuring equipment of all kinds when I was there.
Re:Harvard Quietly Amasses California Vineyards and the Wate...
by usrusr on Wednesday December 12, 2018 @03:23AM
(#18662257)
But that's still consistent with what GP was writing: that expensive stuff is research, not teaching, funded by grants, not tuition. Some students will take a role in experiments running at those facilities, but many will never see those places from the inside.
There is a simple thought experiment to tell research facilities from teaching facilities: if they increased the number of admissions, would they need another particle accelerator?
Re:Harvard Quietly Amasses California Vineyards and the Wate...
by selimthegrim on Wednesday December 12, 2018 @05:36AM
(#18662750)
Grinnell?
Most of the money goes to salaries, and at this point, most of the salaries go to administrators who add no value. There's also a lot of duplication and nonsense in modern curricula; someone could easily do a better job.
It's bad enough the Thiel Fellowship looks pretty good; you have to assume modern college has nothing to do with actually educating people; seems to be more of a codpiece than anything else.