> You take the bad with the good of an internet with fewer restrictions, or you add both bad and good for everyone with restrictions.

One could try enacting clear restrictions that do not require a team of lawyers to divine a meaning, and one of lobbyists to make sure the meaning is correct. You can write regulations that take intention and unlawful gains into account. And, finally, you can get somebody that understands the subject to tell you what can actually be done and what is sci-fi.

But it seems that lawmakers worldwide consider themselves above that kind of concern.