News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon’s Chips Threaten Intel by basilgohar on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @12:55AM (#18653498)
And yet, here he/she gets exactly the result they were looking for. It's a well known online trope that you get your question answered faster and more thoroughly by posting a wrong answer first rather than plainly asking. My guess is it triggers something primal in us geeks.

See: https://xkcd.com/386/

Re:Amazon’s Chips Threaten Intel by jawnv6 on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @05:14PM (#18659484)
It's still incredibly disrespectful way to approach a community, and all of these replies ignore the thrust of my question about the expert re-upping after this ruse has been made apparent.

Comboy spread a lot of disinformation in the first post, like "I'm surprised there's still not much effort to make FPGAs more affordable and base everything on it." before the lie was laid bare. Looking forward to arguing with "FPGA experts" who harken back to that post as their primary source.

Re:Amazon’s Chips Threaten Intel by fhars on Tuesday December 11, 2018 @01:52AM (#18653621)
That trope is called Cunningham‘s law: https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cunningham%27s_Law