News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel: EUV-Enabled 7nm Process Tech is on Track by jacquesm on Monday December 10, 2018 @03:11AM (#18646109)
If it is on track then one would expect at least a description of that track, but all I see is dates related to 10 nm and that was years late. They cleverly skip that by not offering a hard date but stating 'four years after 10 m', but that's not yet a done deal.

Intel is still in the planning stages of manufacturing capacity and there is zero proof that there is an actual POC or workable process yet to mass produce 7 nm devices at all, which is going to be much harder than 10 nm to get to acceptable yield.

I'll park this one right next to 'home fusion' and '5cts / KWh installed Solar Power' until there is more proof, I would be quite surprised if there really are mass produced devices for consumer use anywhere in the next 5 years, if the 10 nm experience is any guide somewhere in the next decade is more realistic so this isn't really news.

Re:Intel: EUV-Enabled 7nm Process Tech is on Track by ascar on Monday December 10, 2018 @03:47AM (#18646273)
Doesn't AMD with TSMC 7nm basically ready to go? TSMC is already talking about 5nm.

While you might not see it in consumer hardware from Intel anytime soon, you will from AMD.

Re:Intel: EUV-Enabled 7nm Process Tech is on Track by leoc on Monday December 10, 2018 @03:50AM (#18646289)
Isn’t TSMC’s “7nm” more comparable to Intel’s 10nm?
Re:Intel: EUV-Enabled 7nm Process Tech is on Track by Valmar on Monday December 10, 2018 @04:37AM (#18646493)
On paper, yes.

In practice, TSMC's 7nm node is actually functional, and producing working chips.

Intel's 10nm... well, is garbage, because they were overconfident.

Now Intel has to either rework their 10nm node, after wasting many years of work on nothing, or just jump straight at 7nm, which seems equivalent to TSMC's 3nm node plans.