Re:The price of the Manhattan Project (2013)
by ethbro on Sunday December 09, 2018 @11:08PM
(#18645116)
Also, as the article points out, it's really hard to write exciting books about achieving incredibly tight tolerances in manufacturing.
And engineers tend to be less colorfully interesting than physicists. (No offense intended, I'd include myself in this characterization)
Re:The price of the Manhattan Project (2013)
by Tsubasachan on Monday December 10, 2018 @05:53AM
(#18646908)
Keep in mind that the Germans didn't have access to many resources. The allies had Africa, the Middle East and South America to supply them with all they needed.
Re:The price of the Manhattan Project (2013)
by iguy on Monday December 10, 2018 @01:05PM
(#18649815)
Indeed, there could have been some other critical shortage barring the way. (IIRC the soviet bomb-makers mined half their uranium in germany, but something else maybe.) But aggregate industrial capacity wasn't obviously a show-stopper, if they were able to fund another very high-tech high-cost project.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-2_rocket#Assessment
I think what the article is saying is that there was an awful lot of technical knowledge between the scientific understanding (e.g. talking about what Heisenberg did or didn't know) and being able to build a factory. This knowledge the allies also didn't have at the beginning, of course.