Re:Australia’s vague anti-encryption law sets a dangerous ne...
by mirimir on Sunday December 09, 2018 @12:12AM
(#18639443)
If you think that this is a new thing, I recommend reading James Bamford's books about the NSA and its predecessors. It was not uncommon for technical staff to discreetly provide data to government intelligence agencies. Back in the telegraph days, that meant shlepping rolls of paper tape. Later, magnetic wire and tape. And this was often done without management knowledge. Because, you know, these were patriotic guys.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Australia’s vague anti-encryption law sets a dangerous ne...
by fit2rule on Sunday December 09, 2018 @01:06AM
(#18639630)
That is what is so scary about this. Australia is still committing crimes against humanity - this law pulls the tech community into that, and involves us in something that I would hope a lot of us would never choose to willingly participate in. But, if we leave in protest, the gap will be filled with people who have no problems with these human rights violations.
Re:Australia’s vague anti-encryption law sets a dangerous ne...
by mirimir on Sunday December 09, 2018 @01:39AM
(#18639722)
Just to be clear, this is insidious.
Before, engineers etc might be guilt-tripped into helping catch "bad people". But this makes it official, with penalties for refusal.
Maybe it demonstrates that engineers etc don't cooperate as freely as they once did. That would be good news, no?