Re:Tesla's giant battery saved $40M during its first year, r...
by cal5k on Thursday December 06, 2018 @01:39PM
(#18620764)
I guess the implication is that the manufactured cost is still significantly higher than the cost of the raw materials, which implies lots of room for improvement.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla's giant battery saved $40M during its first year, r...
by SlowRobotAhead on Thursday December 06, 2018 @03:39PM
(#18621965)
I wish more people understood that lithium and aluminum are transported almost entirely around the world on tanker fuel before they're made into a product - and then it's STILL cheaper to make new batteries than to recycle them.
I don't know enough to say the true impact is different than the stated impact or anything like that. But I have my suspicions that something isn't what it seems with lithium production.