Re:State of web browsers in 2018
by curlypaul924 on Thursday December 06, 2018 @01:18PM
(#18620566)
Advertising isn't fundamentally bad for privacy, otherwise newspapers and movies would be bad for privacy; it's targeted advertising (which requires keeping a profile for each user) that is fundamentally at odds with privacy.
Well, advertisers are going to do their job as well as they can, defined by the amount of money their methods bring. They can't track in newspapers or movies because there's no feasible way to do so. If you want a business to not do something that brings it more money, you'll have to introduce legal liability that makes that something not worthwhile. That's probably GDPR, in a nutshell.
People are bitching and moaning about Mozilla pulling an extension that works around paywalls from addons.mozilla.org, so do you honestly think that people are willing to "financially support the sites they visited"?
Without hitting a paywall that can't be worked around, hell will freeze over before that happens ;-)
People would be willing to if they had a choice that wasn't "Buy a year's subscription to our newspaper to read the one article you want"
Is this what you're against, or has Brave done something else that deserves being dismissive of them?