Re:YouTube top earners: A seven-year-old making $22M
by SmellyGeekBoy on Tuesday December 04, 2018 @05:10AM
(#18598052)
Are you saying Mr. Rogers did all of his work for free out of the goodness of his heart? He was a TV personality and totally reliant on ratings to pay the bills. I don't see how YouTube is any different.
Re:YouTube top earners: A seven-year-old making $22M
by attende_domine on Tuesday December 04, 2018 @08:16AM
(#18599123)
Of course Fred had bills to pay as well, but on the whole his motivations were certainly overwhelmingly altruistic. Read his Wikipedia page[1] to get an idea of what drove him to produce Mr. Rogers. Here's an excerpt:
>Trained and ordained as a minister, Rogers was displeased with the way television addressed children. He began to write and perform local Pittsburgh-area shows for youth. In 1968, Eastern Educational Television Network began nationwide distribution of Rogers's new show on WQED. Over the course of three decades, Rogers became a television icon of children's entertainment and education.
>Rogers advocated various public causes. In the Betamax case, the U.S. Supreme Court cited Rogers's prior testimony before a lower court in favor of fair-use television show recording (now called time shifting). Rogers also testified before a U.S. Senate committee to advocate for government funding of children's television.
Re:YouTube top earners: A seven-year-old making $22M
by WalterBright on Tuesday December 04, 2018 @04:03AM
(#18597683)
Ironically, Mr. Rogers created a following and something that kept people coming back for more.
The other personalities, do not specifically cater to this. They're more interested in creating a following and creating something that keeps people coming back for more.