News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Firefox Profilemaker by 0xffff2 on Monday December 03, 2018 @01:13PM (#18591246)
>(This is in fact sarcasm before you get too eager with that down arrow)

I see this defense quite a lot on the internet, and I think it's misplaced. Even without your comment, I would have downvoted you, not because I though you were in earnest, but because your sarcastic comment doesn't add anything to the conversation.

Re:Firefox Profilemaker by CaptSpify on Monday December 03, 2018 @03:13PM (#18592465)
I think it adds a lot to the conversation. It's an obviously poor argument, which points out how poor it is when Mozilla uses it to make obviously poor choices.
Re:Firefox Profilemaker by huhtenberg on Monday December 03, 2018 @04:22PM (#18593194)
Technically, your comment doesn't add much to the conversation either.
Re:Firefox Profilemaker by 0xffff2 on Monday December 03, 2018 @11:23PM (#18596245)
I agree that my comment is of extremely limited value. Usually I just down vote and move on for that very reason. Today I chose to explain why instead.

The difference is that I believe that my comment has a very small positive value, while I believe that the comment I responded to has a small to moderate negative value.

Re:Firefox Profilemaker by albertgoeswoof on Monday December 03, 2018 @06:28PM (#18594261)
If you believe that your comment adds value, then so must the parent comment. If that’s true then your comment is false and adds no value.

Quite paradoxical.