Re:Anthropologists Say Gladiators and Soldiers in Ancient Ro...
by SerLava on Monday December 03, 2018 @03:54PM
(#18592861)
I'm trying to imagine a gash in my fat gladiator arm that's big enough to see from across the Colosseum and describing it as "doesn't hurt much."
Re:Anthropologists Say Gladiators and Soldiers in Ancient Ro...
by Someone on Monday December 03, 2018 @06:32PM
(#18594293)
Blood conveniently is an intense red and it can spread over a large area without losing much of its color. A nosebleed, for example, can look quite dramatic.
Pain also is highly subjective, and can depend on psychological factors. A gladiator may have thought “that looks as if I fought hard, so they will let me live, and it is survivable”, rather than “that’s half an inch deep, bleeds like , and I will never be able to use that arm again!”
Regardless, that gash in your fat arm easily beats an equally sized gash hitting a major artery or cutting into a bone.
Is that likely? Per calorie, meat is more expensive, and people weren’t that rich, on average, at the time. Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Roman_cuisine states: John E. Stambaugh writes that meat "was scarce except at sacrifices and the dinner parties of the rich."
Also, gladiators may have been loading carbs to gain a protective layer of fat. https://archive.archaeology.org/0811/abstracts/gladiator.htm...:
”Gladiators, it seems, were fat. Consuming a lot of simple carbohydrates, such as barley, and legumes, like beans, was designed for survival in the arena. Packing in the carbs also packed on the pounds. "Gladiators needed subcutaneous fat," Grossschmidt explains. "A fat cushion protects you from cut wounds and shields nerves and blood vessels in a fight." Not only would a lean gladiator have been dead meat, he would have made for a bad show. Surface wounds "look more spectacular," says Grossschmidt. "If I get wounded but just in the fatty layer, I can fight on," he adds. "It doesn't hurt much, and it looks great for the spectators."”