News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Metal-Air Transistor Replaces Semiconductors by twtw on Sunday December 02, 2018 @04:47PM (#18584776)
Right. I see now that I was unclear in that second part - I should have written something like "just because EM waves can propagate in vacuum does not mean you can induce a current density in vacuum." Of course EM waves can induce current density in antennas and other structures.

> Obviously you can't induce a current in vacuum ...

Yes. I wrote that second part because 'mmmBacon seemed to be arguing that one could induce a current in vacuum; that because vacuum has a characteristic impedance, it isn't an insulator (i.e. can support current because it has characteristic impedance).

Re:New Metal-Air Transistor Replaces Semiconductors by mmmBacon on Sunday December 02, 2018 @06:49PM (#18585334)
@twtw was not arguing that one can induce a current in the vacuum. However, I did say that a surface can arc in vacuum. This is because a surface can emit charges either thermally or in presence of a large electric field. This is correct and didstinct from current induction in media. Please note this phenomenon should not be confused with arc discharge in gas.

See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_arc

Re:New Metal-Air Transistor Replaces Semiconductors by twtw on Sunday December 02, 2018 @09:40PM (#18585990)
Right, but that effect is pretty much unrelated to the characteristic impedance of free space and doesn't mean that vacuum is not an insulator.
Re:New Metal-Air Transistor Replaces Semiconductors by mmmBacon on Sunday December 02, 2018 @11:17PM (#18586286)
I’m sorry but I fundamentally disagree. GP said vacuum is a perfect insulator. Comment was in response to that demonstrating that it is not.
Re:New Metal-Air Transistor Replaces Semiconductors by analognoise on Sunday December 02, 2018 @05:39PM (#18585021)
Ah, gotcha, appreciate the clarification.