Re:The Second Edition of “Refactoring”
by josteink on Sunday December 02, 2018 @11:39AM
(#18583013)
I’m not against types. In fact I mostly prefer typed languages.
I’m just stating that there is nothing fundamental about code-refactoring which ties it exclusively to the domain of typed programming-languages, something I consider fairly self-evident.
I mean obviously one can refactor terrible code in any language to help improve its structure right?
That this remark would cause such sub-thread defending types in general (I never said they didn’t have value) has me honestly quite surprised.
I’m just stating that there is nothing fundamental about code-refactoring which ties it exclusively to the domain of typed programming-languages, something I consider fairly self-evident.
I mean obviously one can refactor terrible code in any language to help improve its structure right?
That this remark would cause such sub-thread defending types in general (I never said they didn’t have value) has me honestly quite surprised.