Re:I Put Words on This Webpage So You Have to Listen to Me Now
by mattnumbers on Saturday December 01, 2018 @06:00PM
(#18579533)
Judging from the units on the graph, looks like the author measured the inverse reactive current used by the unilateral phase detractors. Cache purging wouldn't play a role unless your prefabulated amulite is out of sync.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I Put Words on This Webpage So You Have to Listen to Me Now
by rjmill on Saturday December 01, 2018 @11:34PM
(#18580818)
There's your problem. Experimental rilkef isn't suitable for the operation of nophertrunions, no matter what the benchmarks suggest. In my experience, the speed of experimental rilkef is unparalleled, but there's too much side fumbling to use in a production environment.
Re:I Put Words on This Webpage So You Have to Listen to Me Now
by gpm on Saturday December 01, 2018 @06:45PM
(#18579782)
The units on the graph are misleading you. Notice that both measurements were multiples of 100. They were probably just measuring the load on the prefabulated amulite.
Re:I Put Words on This Webpage So You Have to Listen to Me Now
by masonic on Sunday December 02, 2018 @03:46AM
(#18581482)
The graphics are misleading in that both values are actually the same but we ran out of toner, so later we changed the numbers to fit the partial graphic. As long as the visuals agree, the datumses are unimportant.