News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mozilla pulls Bypass Paywalls from Firefox add-ons store by scarface74 on Friday November 30, 2018 @12:27PM (#18570669)
1. So you have the set of people who would be much better off in a “walled garden”, in my experience that is almost everyone.

2. You have the set of people who can compile the code from source and who want to get outside of the wall.

3. You have the set of people who want to get out of the wall but don’t have the technical expertise to know the dangers of doing so.

4. You have people who have the technical expertise to know the dangers but not the technical expertise to compile code.

I think people in group 4 should learn how to be in group 2, because we have almost four decades worth of evidence to know how badly people in group 3 can do.

Edit: changed group 2 to group 3 in the last sentence.

Re:Mozilla pulls Bypass Paywalls from Firefox add-ons store by SilasX on Friday November 30, 2018 @12:34PM (#18570716)
Perhaps, they forced them to do that in the middle of their workday in order to get their UX back. Imagine if your computer crashed and when it restarted it came with the mouse drivers disabled and you had to use the arrows to move the mouse around, and you were reassured you could sign up for WDN to restore use of the mouse.

And I don’t think expecting the user to personally recompile for every update is reasonable, especially if you claim to let users gain control of their machines again.

Re:Mozilla pulls Bypass Paywalls from Firefox add-ons store by dictum on Friday November 30, 2018 @12:51PM (#18570867)
Compiling a browser isn't exactly a walk in the park for the average 5 year+ old PC, either.

Googlers working on Chromium dev get maxed-out machines for this reason.

Re:Mozilla pulls Bypass Paywalls from Firefox add-ons store by scarface74 on Friday November 30, 2018 @01:47PM (#18571451)
The same users who have complete “control of thier computer” who don’t know what they are doing is what causes all of the crapware, malware, ransomware on many Windows based PCs.

I’m all for platforms being in a wall gardener by default where you have to jump through a few hoops to unlock an “advanced mode”.

And signing up for WDN (Windows Developer Network?) hopefully you would get signed drivers.

You can’t imagine the number of times my mom has done the perfectly reasonable thing of searching for Windows printer drivers on Google and ended up installing crapware from a third party site instead of getting the official driver. Signing requirements from MS would hopefully alleviate that and let advanced users try to figure out how to load unsigned drivers.

(Also tangentially, why are printer drivers still a thing on Windows anyway? Anyone who connects a Mac, iPad, or iPhone to my home network - if I give them access to the non-guest network - automatically can print.)