Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview
by ejanus on Friday November 30, 2018 @11:20AM
(#18570151)
No reason to take what is not yours, there is no room here to justify such even if the system is broken.
Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview
by tvladeck on Friday November 30, 2018 @12:54PM
(#18570902)
“It’s a necessary evil”
Company motto: “Don’t be evil”
Do you notice the hypocrisy here?
Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview
by DonHopkins on Friday November 30, 2018 @02:35PM
(#18571922)
"Don't JUST be evil. Be evil AND greedy."
Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview
by 16bytes on Friday November 30, 2018 @02:21PM
(#18571805)
My experience with patents extends beyond Google. I've never heard "It's a necessary evil" uttered anywhere here.
Aside from that, I'm not saying that there's not hypocrisy but I am saying that the real story is often more nuanced than first appearances.
Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview
by DonHopkins on Friday November 30, 2018 @02:33PM
(#18571907)
>"I have a bunch of work to do and need to get counsel off my back"
You would have had a hell of a lot more work to do if you'd actually come up with the ideas you patented yourself, instead of stealing somebody else's bunch of work they did.
Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview
by nathanasmith on Friday November 30, 2018 @10:56AM
(#18569964)
>It doesn't make what happened here right, but I think it's unfair to assume malice.
I'll probably burn some Hacker News points here but the old adage needs to be updated. Never attribute to stupidity or malice what can be attributed to both stupidity and malice.
In my experience outside of Google, typically how this works is that you will get a visit from product counsel asking if you have any patent-able work. It's not your job to ask if it's novel enough; that's the patent lawyers job.
So they bug you for months while you are trying to get work done asking about what you are working on and how it works, and then file something on your behalf. I can't recall if I even needed to sign anything before a provisional application was filed.
The way that this is pitched is that it's a necessary evil. One needs a huge patent portfolio to protect your tech inventions, because when you are sued, you can leverage your portfolio to protect yourself. I hate this system and how it works, but it is a business reality.
I don't know Regina, but I think Hanlon's razor applies. It less likely that she woke up one day and said, "well, I want to steal other people's inventions today!", than, "oh I have a bunch of work to do and need to get counsel off my back."
It doesn't make what happened here right, but I think it's unfair to assume malice.