Benchmark results of Kubernetes network plugins over 10Gb/s network

Re:Benchmark results of Kubernetes network plugins over 10Gb... by sofaofthedamned on Friday November 30, 2018 @08:52AM (#18569081)

I'm impressed that all non-encrypted methods are so close to bare-metal. Wonder how much CPU was impacted at those rates though?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Benchmark results of Kubernetes network plugins over 10Gb... by sascha_sl on Friday November 30, 2018 @12:04PM (#18570474)

In the case of flannel I know that not a lot actually happens that'd influence that. It's signaling and orchestration. flannel allocates a subnet and throws up a VXLAN interface. That's it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Benchmark results of Kubernetes network plugins over 10Gb... by kitd on Friday November 30, 2018 @08:58AM (#18569118)

CPU usage was the final test, near the end of the article.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Benchmark results of Kubernetes network plugins over 10Gb... by sofaofthedamned on Friday November 30, 2018 @11:56AM (#18570421)

Ah missed that, ta!

[ Parent | on HN ]