News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ObjectBox: Fast object-oriented database for Go by wmu on Friday November 30, 2018 @06:53AM (#18568433)
Are there any benchmarks that show how fast this db is?
Re:ObjectBox: Fast object-oriented database for Go by greenrobot on Friday November 30, 2018 @07:08AM (#18568491)
The Go release post (https://objectbox.io/go-objectbox-golang/) has some numbers. "On a i7-8850H CPU, ObjectBox consistently processes over 1.5 million CRUD operations per second with 4.4 million object reads per second."
Re:ObjectBox: Fast object-oriented database for Go by thomaslewis on Friday November 30, 2018 @07:00AM (#18568463)
There's some general info here, including a comparison to SQLite: https://objectbox.io/dev-get-started/

For Android, there's even a repository to test it yourself: https://github.com/objectbox/objectbox-performance

Re:ObjectBox: Fast object-oriented database for Go by b2ccb2 on Friday November 30, 2018 @08:17AM (#18568813)
Comparing a RDBMS with an object database is pretty useless for benchmarking.

I'd be more interested to see comparison to, for example, Realm[1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realm_(database)

Re:ObjectBox: Fast object-oriented database for Go by greenrobot on Friday November 30, 2018 @12:18PM (#18570586)
There's a open source benchmark here: https://github.com/objectbox/objectbox-performance - last time I checked ObjectBox was several times faster than Realm.
Re:ObjectBox: Fast object-oriented database for Go by ken on Friday November 30, 2018 @05:19PM (#18573253)
I only see Java source code here. Is ObjectBox Java the same database code as ObjectBox Go?

EDIT: I see the 'objectbox-go' repo has a separate set of perf tests, but only for ObjectBox Go -- not either of the unnamed "NoSQL" competitors, nor for SQLite.

Re:ObjectBox: Fast object-oriented database for Go by greenrobot on Saturday December 01, 2018 @04:24AM (#18576027)
The initial question was about Realm, thus the link to Java. The core of ObjectBox is the same on every platform (C/C++ for maximum speed). We haven't finished the other benchmarks yet. Sorry for teasing with those. We'll be done with those soon and they will be open source.