Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview
by geezerjay on Friday November 30, 2018 @01:44AM
(#18567245)
> What makes this terrible advice?
Some PhD programs focus on non-marketable topics that don't help candidates develop marketable skills, and exist only to dump the research group's drudge work on an unsuspecting soul.
Wasting years of your life in a low-pay low opportunity dead-end job that's prone to abuse just to pursuit a pipe dream is not a great career move, particularly if the alternative is landing a job at Google.
Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview
by Twisol on Friday November 30, 2018 @02:56AM
(#18567491)
This is all true! Entering into a graduate program without being fully aware of what you’re embarking on and what you’re getting out of it is a bad idea. But I would argue this generalizes beyond just grad school.
Some people enjoy scholarship and research. There are places that support this. To generalize only slightly unfairly, most of industry is not conducive to this kind of personal goal. Pipe dream it may be, but we still have artists and musicians.
Re:Google Tried to Patent My Work After a Job Interview
by thaumasiotes on Friday November 30, 2018 @01:11AM
(#18567124)
> I picked up an excellent job after my Master's (at the same place I had left behind previously!)
It sounds like you would agree that joining a PhD program is not a good idea.
I left a very good position on the table after my undergrad, in favor of pursuing a graduate degree. I weighed my options and decided that I would rather spend some years in my youth learning how to conduct research -- lessons I believed, and still believe, will carry through into my future endeavors. I picked up an excellent job after my Master's (at the same place I had left behind previously!) and am very happy with how things played out.
I realize this is the best possible outcome, but what makes this general arc such a bad idea?