News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Go 2, here we come by CydeWeys on Thursday November 29, 2018 @07:12PM (#18565434)
This argument falls flat for me. Classes aren't supported natively by processors either, yet any number of OOP languages use them.

It's generally nice when you can do simple things with the language's built-in standard library. I tend to prefer languages with more powerful standard libraries because it means that you can more easily move across codebases since they'll all be the same. If commonly used data types like rationals, hashes, maps, strings, etc., aren't defined in the stdlib, then there'll be any number of different libraries to use them, and you'll have to potentially re-learn a lot of different unnecessary things when working on different codebases.

Re:Go 2, here we come by passwd on Friday November 30, 2018 @08:06AM (#18568759)
Yes, standard library. I understood the poster above you to suggest they shouldn't be a part of language by that's used by default, for sure though it would be convenient to have centralized implementation.
Re:Go 2, here we come by makapuf on Friday November 30, 2018 @10:43AM (#18569862)
Exactly. Having a rational datatype as easily usable as float would make it easier to use as a default when you don't really need floats but just non integers. Which is often the case if you think about it. Automatic simplifications, literals (12.345122 is a rational, as well as 22/7)