Re:Pythran as a bridge between fast prototyping and code dep...
by SubiculumCode on Thursday November 29, 2018 @03:37PM
(#18563749)
Seems there could be a cost/benefit analysis here.
Ten times faster than python might be sufficient for some applications given the potential for much faster deployment, regardless of whether handwritten C might be faster.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pythran as a bridge between fast prototyping and code dep...
by jeanl on Thursday November 29, 2018 @06:07PM
(#18565025)
You're absolutely right: you don't necessarily need to be within 10% of pure C++ if algo development is made far easier by using python/numpy. But it would be good to have a hand-written C++ baseline to determine where the cost/benefit point is (at least for this example).