Re:Linux Journal: Readers' Choice Awards 2010 - Best Program...
by dagw on Monday November 01, 2010 @08:28AM
(#1856165)
This is the result of counting a bunch of votes, not a persons opinion, and as such I imagine it has more to do with overall popularity than anything more objective. See the results as number of content users each program has and it makes far more sense.
Re:Linux Journal: Readers' Choice Awards 2010 - Best Program...
by loewenskind on Monday November 01, 2010 @10:28AM
(#1856550)
> If someone likes centralized over distributed, Subversion should beat both Git and Mercurial.
Personally I think you can do centralized better with Git and Mercurial then you can with Subversion. You just have to add some hooks to enforce it.
Are we in the Bizarro world? I know that Git vs. Mercurial is a bit like Vim vs. Emacs, but I can't see how any rational person could rank them on opposite sides of Subversion. If someone likes centralized over distributed, Subversion should beat both Git and Mercurial. If one likes distributed, both Git and Mercurial should beat Subversion.