Re:Today’s JavaScript trash fire and pile on
by crooked-v on Monday November 26, 2018 @03:58PM
(#18536737)
We don't need a standard library, they said. Letting basic functionality be spread out through a hundred thousand separate packages is fine, they said...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Today’s JavaScript trash fire and pile on
by tracker1 on Monday November 26, 2018 @05:56PM
(#18537621)
There is a standard library... what comes in Node, or what comes in the Browser... anything beyond that is non-standard. I'm not sure where your problem is here. It's true of any other platform on the planet, some things are in the box, others are not.
Re:Today’s JavaScript trash fire and pile on
by idle_zealot on Monday November 26, 2018 @07:10PM
(#18538027)
The complain is that Node/the browser's "box" is too small. OP wants a "batteries included" standard library.
If size/resource consumption is a concern, the library could be broken up and `import`ed as necessary now that modules are a thing. Whatever standards body that chooses to implement this wouldn't even need tot worry about breaking old code and name collisions, as it could all be opt-in.