News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI Mistakes Bus-Side Ad for Famous CEO, Charges Her With ... by dahfizz on Sunday November 25, 2018 @05:51PM (#18529598)
I take your point, but there is a big difference between being homeless and being without income. Retirees are the most obvious example, but there are plenty of 'normal' people who don't have an income that basically get to speed and park illegally for free under this sort of system. Unless of course, we put in a minimum fine for everything and charge extra based on income beyond that. But this does nothing to help the poor and ends up just being a punishment for having a good job.

I also think people imagine the super rich having to pay huge fines under this kind of system, but it's the same problem as with taxing the super wealthy. Their income is actually very low relative to the wealth they are accumulating.

Re:AI Mistakes Bus-Side Ad for Famous CEO, Charges Her With ... by askvictor on Sunday November 25, 2018 @07:48PM (#18530120)
Retirees still have an income (public or private pension), as do (in civilised countries) the unemployed (in the form a dole/unemployment benefits), but yes, a minimum charge + extra seems to make sense (perhaps with an exception for homelessness.

> ends up just being a punishment for having a good job.

No; it's a punishment for breaking the law, with (ideally) the punishment scaling to create a similar deterrent to everyone in the society.