Re:A Mystery Font That Took Over New York
by matt4077 on Thursday November 22, 2018 @09:02PM
(#18513855)
> Content piracy has been a catalyst for change.
Yet paying for content has been a catalyst for...content.
> they might be incentivized to problem solve that for me.
What is that even supposed to mean?
* A domain name like ipfs://nytimesmirror.com that mirrors nytimes articles (at the same relative URLs) * Some kind of crowdsourced process for content curation.
I'm aware that it's not legal, but I wouldn't be against it. Content piracy has been a catalyst for change. I simultaneously would be willing to pay nytimes for access to their content but I'm not willing to sign up to a $15 / month subscription. So if their content was widely pirated using delivery method like IPFS they might be incentivized to problem solve that for me.