News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sigrid Johnson Was Black. A DNA Test Said She Wasn’t by Nasrudith on Wednesday November 21, 2018 @12:08AM (#18500282)
Technically it is an ethnicity but the South American population does have a larger percent of assimilated natives than continental Spain and a long history of a caste system which put born natives lower in the hierarchy than those born in Spain which could arguably make them a more divergent set of genetic traits being messily correlated. One can argue about the name but "Hispanic" is a workable proxy for the broad brush of 'everything below the continental born caste'.

Of course if you want to talk genetics instead of silly human labels you look at the actual contents of their genome.

Re:Sigrid Johnson Was Black. A DNA Test Said She Wasn’t by masonic on Wednesday November 21, 2018 @03:27AM (#18501055)

  Technically it is an ethnicity
No, it's defined by geography only. Someone of pure Spanish blood and another of purely Mayan blood can both be "Hispanic".

"African" is similarly vague. A pure Bantu, an Egyptian, and an Amazight from Morocco are all African.

Re:Sigrid Johnson Was Black. A DNA Test Said She Wasn’t by Nasrudith on Wednesday November 21, 2018 @07:59AM (#18502312)
I realized afterwards that I had meant nationality but that wouldn't be quite accurate either - unless you count former ones like "was once a part of the USSR". And even that would probably be pushing it.
Re:Sigrid Johnson Was Black. A DNA Test Said She Wasn’t by BurningFrog on Wednesday November 21, 2018 @12:58PM (#18504603)
"Hispanic" is a useful concept in some contexts.

I don't see how DNA analysis can be one of them!