Re:Google says its sex misconduct policy change doesn't appl...
by 013a on Tuesday November 20, 2018 @01:09PM
(#18496050)
I did use the word "dubious" on purpose. There are certainly more strictly evil companies out there, but the moral ground Google operates on is the definition of Dubious. Its shaky and doubtful. They're self-righteous about their morality, dating back to their classic motto "Don't Be Evil", but startlingly few of their actions, especially those directly related to their products, ever feel in line with this now tossed-aside motto. In other words, they're managed by a handful of children with Computer Science degrees and relentless ambition; the moment something goes wrong they throw up their hands and yell "we're solving problems no one else has attempted" without any introspection that maybe the problem wouldn't even exist if they didn't.
But that's not really an option for any company. So they continue on.
I mean, I might have put some tobacco, arms, oil, coal, chemical, and surveillance companies up there. Particularly since I don't see them leading the way on harassment, inequity, diversity, or any of the other things Google is being criticized for. It sort of seems as though they have all the same issues plus body counts. But perhaps I've missed the news, are Gazprom and Saudi Aramco famous for how well they handle sexual harassment claims?
Your point about corporate ruthlessness is a solid one, but putting Google at the head of that list seriously undersells the problem. It's worth remembering how bad things are, and how bad they can get.
Hell, now that I'm thinking of it, I'd put Chiquita higher up on the list than Google. They never actually got over the bad old days in Honduras, they were caught funding and directly arming Colombian terrorists in 2004.