News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The quest for freedom and safety: Why I donated $100,000 ... by erikpukinskis on Friday October 29, 2010 @06:48PM (#1849375)
If you could walk into the drugstore and buy mushrooms, marijuana, 2CB, 2CI, LSD, DMT, adderol, MDMA, heroin and cocaine, how many people do you think would still be playing around with meth?
Re:The quest for freedom and safety: Why I donated $100,000 ... by lukifer on Friday October 29, 2010 @07:45PM (#1849532)
In some circles (truckers and construction workers), use of meth can directly translate into less sleep and therefore more money. And yes, I still think recreational meth users would also still exist. Never underestimate the self-destructive capacity of addictive behavior/personality.
Re:The quest for freedom and safety: Why I donated $100,000 ... by dinkumthinkum on Friday October 29, 2010 @08:32PM (#1849654)
I don't know what your response is meant to convey. Are you implying that legalizing heroin would be great to stem the tide of meth abuse?
Re:The quest for freedom and safety: Why I donated $100,000 ... by Alex3917 on Saturday October 30, 2010 @08:33PM (#1852146)
First off, very few people would use heroin if opium were legal. But even ignoring that, heroin is one of the safest drugs there is. There are virtually no longterm negative effects on physical or mental health[1], and it's almost impossible to accidentally O.D. on, especially if you're doing it with folks who have access to naloxone. Of the 500k+ current users, there are only ~200 deaths per year from heroin[2], and a good chunk of those are suicides. In other words, it's perhaps 25x safer than smoking American cigarrettes.

[1] C.f. The Consumer Union Guide to Licit and Illicit Drugs.

[2] Not counting polydrug deaths.