Re:Kelly Criterion (2007)
by pyrex41 on Monday November 19, 2018 @10:21AM
(#18486997)
This is also an argument for finding investments that allow you to better define the downside risk of investments. I think that this is why static investments or hedges have such value; they may not change the expected value, they might even reduce it (based on mean estimates), but they reduce / eliminate the estimation error in your downside risk, allowing you a much more certain calculation of leverage.
[ Parent
| on HN ]