Re:With Facebook at ‘War,’ Zuckerberg Adopts More Aggressive...
by TheOtherHobbes on Sunday November 18, 2018 @07:52PM
(#18483448)
You're assuming that Clegg has expressed his true aims in public. Given his record of spectacular outright lies - such as the famous u-turn on tuition fees, or the way that he denied being a Young Conservative at Cambridge, in spite of the evidence - it's possible his affable victim-of-circumstance brand is just a cover for someone who is essentially manipulative and dishonest.
Given the successful spoiler/enabler role of the LibDems in UK politics, there's a good chance he doesn't think of his record as one of failure on any level.
Interesting, he has already deleted all of his tweets, including the anti-Brexit ones - not quite the action of the absolutely committed anti-Brexit campaigner he claimed to be.
(To say "FB wouldn't let him keep them" misses the point. Someone who was genuinely committed to stopping Brexit would never accept a job which might conflict with keeping them.)
Re:With Facebook at ‘War,’ Zuckerberg Adopts More Aggressive...
by mcny on Sunday November 18, 2018 @07:58PM
(#18483463)
> it's possible his affable victim-of-circumstance brand is just a cover for someone who is essentially manipulative and dishonest
In that case, he has a long and productive career ahead at Facebook or perhaps at a company like British Petroleum.
With some things like the failed alternate vote referendum I have read people blame Labour more than the Lib Dems. However, he clearly lacks charisma and skills in hindsight.
I don't think anyone at Facebook will force Nick Clegg to do or say anything but I'll be shocked if he has any serious decision-making power within Facebook. I'm trying to avoid saying he is a rubber stamp but it is difficult to say he is much more when even ex CSO Alex Stamos clearly had restrictions (if you read between the lines).