> Protonmail compromises their users data without their knowledge and charges each user a monthly subscription fee. Therefore we felt morally justified compromising Protonmail’s data without their knowledge and charging them a fee for it’s return.

> If they decline again we will [...] sell [all customer data] in bulk to the highest bidder on the darknet

Funny that their moral sense tells them to compromise Protonmail's data because it "charges each user a monthly subscription fee", but it ignores the fact that they might affect users' private information if they release it to the public. Even if they're not lying about the hacking, what's really bullshit is their belief that they're doing the right thing.