News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Estimating the chances of something that hasn’t happened yet by shaki-dora on Thursday November 15, 2018 @11:27PM (#18466408)
I wish the people constantly complaining how n=20,000 is "far too small a sample size to call this science" (for every empirical study) would take not. Effect size matters!
Re:Estimating the chances of something that hasn’t happened yet by Fomite on Friday November 16, 2018 @05:48AM (#18467896)
An absence of statistical training is dangerous. A little statistical training remains dangerous, but gets annoying as well