Re:Big-box retailers are slashing their property taxes throu...
by __jahh on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @07:58PM
(#18455920)
the fa makes the point that what makes a store successful it's location in the flow of a city's life and so the boarded up ones are going to be least productive junctions. The property is worth more because it's the property that is there and NOT the one that is 5 miles further in the under occupied suburbs.
Re:Big-box retailers are slashing their property taxes throu...
by Matticus_Rex on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @11:34PM
(#18456882)
Exactly, but the extent that's the case, it's captured in the market value.
Re:Big-box retailers are slashing their property taxes throu...
by SilasX on Thursday November 15, 2018 @11:02AM
(#18460288)
It's not that big a problem. You can let everyone designate one primary residence, and exempt the first $X of asserted value from taxation. People are entitled some sentimentality exemption, but (like today) not an unbounded one.
Calculating the tax basis value based on what the owner would sell it for has numerous problems even outside that subjectivity. It penalizes businesses for success in a way that promotes looting the company to artificially lower the business value. Aside from the deadweight loss involved, it artificially promotes the type of behavior firms like Bain are already criticized for. Also, it's highly subject to system-gaming. What is the incentive of a firm to actually accurately value it at what they would sell for while it was open? The only way it works is to enforce some draconian policy that requires them to sell if someone ponies the cash (a la Posner and Weyl's proposition in Radical Markets).