Very few Blue Apron meals were pasta, from what I can remember. If any.
I think the competitor, Gobble, was better by a fair bit, because less prep was required. But obviously that's a tradeoff.
Huh? Don't think I ever had BA need more than two pots/pans total (usually, at most one each, sometimes with the pan reused. Often just the pan.)
> took 2-3x the quoted time for my wife and I to prepare TOGETHER
Usually took slightly longer than quoted alone; but that's going to vary a lot by skill in the kitchen and equipment quality; if you have crappy or poorly maintained knives or poor knife skills, for instance, prep time goes way up.)
> and the pan-searing time for meats was always half of what was required to get it remotely cooked.
Cooking times IME were exact, or a little long; again, though, equipment (stove and cookware) play a role.
We also did Gobble for about two weeks, there is no comparison in the quality of food, Blue Apron is SIGNIFICANTLY better. Gobble was FAR easier to prepare, for example, you would get pre-seasoned, and pre-prepared beef for a meal. Obviously that's very different than cooking a raw cut of meat yourself. But, as you pointed out, the tradeoff was in the quality of the finished food. Not even remotely close between the two.
Blue Apron food was good; occasionally they gave us something nasty but we were usually able to toss it and just skip that one thing.
So I used to struggle with this exact thing as well, and this is how I solved it. You have to remember that when you add the protein to the pan the temperature is going to drop by a large amount. So for me, as soon as I saw the first whisps of smoke off the oil, I would crank the heat up a bit and toss in the protein (or whatever I was starting with). You will be amazed what a difference in makes.
Maybe it was just me but I always found Blue Apron to be 45 mins of cook time. If they could find a way to help me make a meal that was 80% as good in 50% of the time, I'd be a subscriber for life.