News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof by joshumax on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @10:29PM (#18447230)
I ran into this problem a little while back trying to get my Linux implementation of the BSD unveil() system call merged into mainline. Some of the responses to the RFC told me that it shouldn't be added because glibc likely won't add a syscall wrapper for it. However, a response from glibc states that they won't consider adding it until it's been successfully merged into mainline, creating a sort of catch-22 situation.
Re:C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof by kjeetgill on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @10:41PM (#18447279)
Thank you for your efforts! Can you just cc them both on an email and get them to agree together?
Re:C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof by joshumax on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @11:05PM (#18447388)
Hopefully! I plan on doing that for my next RFC!
Re:C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof by emilfihlman on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @09:54AM (#18450221)
This is an idiotic stance from maintainers. Linux already has a lot of things that most currently used libc implementations don't support, like getrandom.