News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging by smacktoward on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @01:00PM (#18443108)
> I only read his post because it's on HN.

Well, yeah, but a post on a self-hosted blog can be posted to HN just as easily as a post on Medium can. And it's not like having "(medium.com)" next to the submission is going to drive upvotes any more than having "(yourdomain.xyz)" would. (For me it actually has the opposite effect; there's so much empty "thought-leader" drivel posted at Medium that seeing that domain next to an HN submission makes me less likely to click through.)

So I guess the question becomes: does Medium function well enough as an aggregator of its own content to make posting there worth the tradeoffs? Does it drive enough traffic from other Medium readers to your own Medium posts to justify giving up everything you have to give up to use the platform? (That's the theory behind Medium, of course, but what I'm wondering is how well it actually works in practice.)

Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging by sh87 on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @05:51PM (#18445658)
> there's so much empty "thought-leader" drivel posted at Medium

I observe, Medium posts are now the equivalent of most TED talks.

Most are useless but the rare good ones make it hard to write the platform off as a self-promotional junk delivery mechanism.

Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging by logifail on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @12:25AM (#18447719)
>> Most are useless but the rare good ones make it hard to write the platform off

Exactly, the platform isn't an indicator of quality. In the long term, how could such a platform be?