Re:People are “consistently inconsistent” in reasoning about...
by ikeboy on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @12:55PM
(#18443054)
Perhaps people are associating your arguments with other, flawed, arguments and assuming yours are flawed as well. Might not be incontrovertible proof but it's enough to critique you.
The guilt-by-association rule is not a hard and fast airtight conclusion. This is the stock criticism everyone is making, and it simply doesn't follow. It's evidence of a flaw, but not every bit of evidence is incontrovertible proof of whatever.
Really, doesn't anyone study logic anymore?