Not OP, but from what I understand a lot of the tests where simulated and the 50' sea level rise they predicted hasn't started happening, etc.

The input data wasn't working with the expected results as well, so they came up with a flaw in the thermometers around the world which they used as justification to massage the numbers.

I dunno. I don't like pollution, but it's feeling a little hoaxie.

Ah, the "Scientists are greedy liars in a giant conspiracy to get rich on research grants" argument.

Is that what I said?

Anyway this doesn't seem like the appropriate forum.