News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging by mockingbirdy on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @09:40AM (#18441237)
Nice, everyone is posting their favourite CMS, again.

I use https://getgrav.org because I like flat-file CMS.

Maybe there are some photographers here: http://koken.me (CMS for photographers).

Another idea: Use a static page generator and Amazon's S3 with this neat blackhat trick - https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/how-one-website-exploited-... (mildly joking).

OT: I pay 0.19$/month for my blog hosting including domain with around 500 views/month (just a personal blog). Many services cost 5$/month, I don't think that's cheap.

edit: Medium is for visibility. I know many SEO experts who use it extensively to increase their rankings. Its UX might be annoying for some, but its true value lies in its popularity and outreach.

Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging by patrickk on Thursday November 15, 2018 @03:20PM (#18462905)
What's your blog? I'm interested in reaching out, can you include your email in your profile? Thanks.
Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging by elcomet on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @10:25AM (#18441628)
What does flat-like means here? Are they talking about the design (flat) ?
Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging by applecrazy on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @10:51AM (#18441841)
It’s referring to how posts are stored serverside. CMS software such as Drupal, Wordpress, etc. store posts in a database. A flat-file CMS stores posts in a file, making editing and creating posts easier. Also saves on the hassle of securing an admin dashboard.
Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging by cpoile on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @10:08AM (#18441486)
What hosting provider do you use for $0.19/mo?
Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging by mockingbirdy on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @02:12PM (#18443858)
Netcup