Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging
by gureddio on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @09:39AM
(#18441228)
I'm expecting downvotes, but self hosted wordpress could work for you.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging
by arkitaip on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @10:23AM
(#18441606)
Unfortunately you got downvoted because HN is obsessed with static site generators. Meanwhile, Wordpress offers a superior writing and reading experience which you, the owner, totally control.
Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging
by how_to_bake on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @10:40AM
(#18441754)
Wordpress seems to be objectively bloated and messy in terms of the website code that is generated. You can run wordpress blogs through a website speed analyzer and compare it with a static gen site and see this.
The "hate" isn't based solely on being hip.
Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging
by gureddio on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @04:58AM
(#18448744)
But this just isn't true.
If you install wordpress, and then grab a bunch of plugins and themes and install them without taking any care, it won't bundle and minify your javascript. It's no different to having a static website and grabbing a load of jquery plugins and throwing them onto a page.
But if you use some techniques such as building your theme and plugins using gulp or similar, you can have your wordpress site outputting bundled and minified javascript.
There are also caching techniques that can be used at the webserver level, just like any other website.
Re:Medium is a poor choice for blogging
by SmellyGeekBoy on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @11:02AM
(#18441949)
Or perhaps less conspiratorially, complaining about votes is against the guidelines here and pretty much guarantees an automatic downvote from a lot of people. As in this case, it never achieves anything other than derailing the conversation.