Re:Pseudonyms to protect authors of controversial articles
by yasp on Monday November 12, 2018 @07:42PM
(#18437364)
What is the right-wing ideological equivalent where its adherents would attempt to deplatform, smear, etc. someone for violating its dogma, and what is the dogma?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pseudonyms to protect authors of controversial articles
by happytoexplain on Monday November 12, 2018 @09:09PM
(#18437856)
There's plenty of extreme harassment, attacks, and "shouting down" coming from the right in response to any ideological disagreement from the left. Worse, explicit calls to violence (that have been answered) and encouragement of hatred from people all the way up and down the chain, from anonymous internet posters to the president. I'm not saying this is worse than the equivalent from the left, but to say it's not there is naive. Additionally, as far as I can tell, nearly all of the major instances of deplatforming of "the right" have really been deplatforming of meaningless hateful garbage or calls to violence that violate terms of service, but have been framed as attacks on the right, which seems like a really awful mischaracterization of the right.
Re:Pseudonyms to protect authors of controversial articles
by Sacho on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @02:33AM
(#18439322)
The controversy over abortion rights is way beyond deplatforming and smearing, there's actual murders by self-described anti-abortionists. In George Tiller's case, his clinic was firebombed("deplatforming"?) and O'Reilly had criticized("smearing"?) him heavily, before the assassination.
Re:Pseudonyms to protect authors of controversial articles
by yesenadam on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @02:43AM
(#18439362)
Gee. The US spent most of the 20th C invading countries, mostly for 'violating its dogma' - for being too democratic, for not being subservient enough, in the service of US business interests, mainly. Supporting dictators, giving a lot of weapons, training torturers, subverting democracy, assisting/staging coups, etc etc from Guatemala to Iran. It's a long and well-known story.[0] Millions died.
[0] Although not well-known enough. Good starting points might be the Chomsky's political books (they're extensively referenced - don't just take his word for things, read his sources too), and Scott Noble's documentaries: http://metanoia-films.org/
Re:Pseudonyms to protect authors of controversial articles
by rootusrootus on Monday November 12, 2018 @08:10PM
(#18437535)
"patriotism"
Re:Pseudonyms to protect authors of controversial articles
by slavik81 on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @01:11AM
(#18438994)
Anita Sarkeesian is an example. She received a barrage of violent threats over her feminist critique of video game stories. The threats basically destroyed any hope of a rational conversation.
Re:Pseudonyms to protect authors of controversial articles
by root_axis on Monday November 12, 2018 @09:29PM
(#18437944)
The president is the leader of a right-wing ideology and he attempted to deplatform and smear kneeling players in the NFL. He explicitly asked the NFL to fire kneeling players and smeared them by deliberately misrepresenting their stated position (that they are kneeling to protest police violence).