Re:Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networks
by heyitsguay on Monday November 12, 2018 @05:50PM
(#18436733)
Convex functions aren't the only functions with a single local (and global) minimum - consider sqrt(|x|) for a simple 1d example.
Re:Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networks
by ramgorur on Monday November 12, 2018 @06:06PM
(#18436834)
Yes, that's true. But in optimization domain the concept of "convexity" is understood in terms of set, not always from the 2nd derivative of a function. Because you might have search spaces where you are not able to differentiate the objective function at all. In those cases the "convex" means a "convex set".
Re:Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networks
by LolWolf on Monday November 12, 2018 @06:56PM
(#18437097)
Sure: you can define convexity for a function that is equivalent to the 2nd derivative definition in the case that the function is twice-differentiable, using only the definition of the convexity of a set.
Define the epigraph of a function to be the set given by {(x, t) | f(x) ≤ t}. Then, we say f is a convex function iff the epigraph is a convex set.
This is equivalent (exercise for the reader!) to the usual definition that a function f is convex iff f((1-t)x + ty) ≤ (1-t)f(x) + tf(y), for all 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, with x, y in the domain of f.
Note that neither of these two definitions require differentiability (or twice-differentiability), but the definitions are equivalent in this case.[0]
---
[0] For proofs of all of these statements see B&V's Convex Optimization.
Re:Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networks
by TTPrograms on Monday November 12, 2018 @07:31PM
(#18437295)
When talking about "convex optimization" one nearly always means that both the function and the domain are convex.
Re:Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networks
by srean on Tuesday November 13, 2018 @01:50AM
(#18439155)
No need to define 'convex optimization' here, that follows from the definition of a convex function: F(ax + (1-a)y) <= aF(x) + (1-a) F(y) for 0<=a<=1 and x,y in domain of F. For the inequality to be satisfied ax + (1-a)y has to be in the domain. That mean the domain is convex.
I don't understand. How do you prove a gradient descent is guaranteed to escape local minima?