Re:A critique of Gmail's “smart replies”
by JBiserkov on Monday November 12, 2018 @03:31PM
(#18435459)
Is this perhaps different on mobile vs [desktop] web?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Text message versus gmail, actually. And the difference makes a lot of sense since no one expects a single text to contain all the information of a reply and also texts are more likely to be time sensitive and so reducing friction to answer is good.
Re:A critique of Gmail's “smart replies”
by lordgrenville on Monday November 12, 2018 @04:44PM
(#18436160)
Annoyingly, LinkedIn's messaging system does this (both on mobile and desktop). I probably don't mean to send a two-word response to a long message from a professional contact.
Re:A critique of Gmail's “smart replies”
by adrianratnapala on Monday November 12, 2018 @04:58PM
(#18436307)
But for some reason, LinkedIn has twitter envy, or at least Facebook envy.
It's like how Nature seems constantly put out that it stuck being the premier journal for high end research and wants to make it's presentation and editorial content look as much like Scientific American as possible.
Re:A critique of Gmail's “smart replies”
by lordgrenville on Monday November 12, 2018 @05:21PM
(#18436499)
Ha, that bit about Nature is spot-on.