News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Lie Behind the Lie Detector by ap_org on Monday November 12, 2018 @01:39PM (#18434580)
There is no documented example of the polygraph ever catching a mole. On the contrary, all of the known moles who were subjected to polygraph screening beat the polygraph.
Re:The Lie Behind the Lie Detector by zaroth on Monday November 12, 2018 @03:31PM (#18435461)
Saying that they "beat" the test gives the test too much credence. The test is a ploy to make the subject confess. The only step to beating the test, is the simple knowledge that it's a ploy in the first place.
Re:The Lie Behind the Lie Detector by ap_org on Monday November 12, 2018 @03:51PM (#18435665)
Point well taken. But the U.S. government does consider the polygraph to be a pass/fail procedure. Applicants and employees suffer severe career harm for "failing."
Re:The Lie Behind the Lie Detector by masonic on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @12:54AM (#18447823)
Wasn't Philby caught by polygraph but argued his way out of the results? (He was, in fact, a spy all along).
Re:The Lie Behind the Lie Detector by ap_org on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @02:56AM (#18448290)
No, Philby was not "caught by polygraph."